New Delhi: At a time when many
celebrities from the entertainment industry are demanding big changes in the
certification process of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), a
panel discussion was held at the 7th Jagran Film Festival here to examine its
role in the current era.
Filmmaker Sudhir Mishra along with BJP
spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi, CBFC
member Vani Tripathi and journalist Kaveree Bamzai discussed whether CBFC is
regulating films way beyond its parameters and if it is the correct time to
make changes in its rules and regulations.
BJP-appointed Pahlaj Nihalani, chief of the
Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), the controversy regarding Udta
Punjab and role of the central government in censor board were some of the
topics that the panelists put light upon in the discussion titled 'Is cinema
over regulated?'
Talking about the role of the censor board,
Tripathi said: "CBFC is not a censor but a certification body. I have been
its member since last two years. The process (of certification) is very
complicated and it's not a monolith. There is not just one person who decides
the certification of a film. We are only there to certify a film and not cut
it. The word 'ban' is not at all part of the vocabulary of CBFC".
Trivedi said that cinema has a big influence on
the audience, that's why a regulatory body is need of the hour.
Comparing media with films, Trivedi added:
"There is a difference between news and the impact of cinema. Earlier we
used to say that literature is a mirror of the society. But I feel today cinema
is a mirror of the society".
"The impact that films have on children is
not the same when they read news. So when there is a medium which is
influencing our perception towards the society, then there should be a
regulatory body which can keep an eye on it. We should looks out that what
message the film is spreading," he added.
Speaking on the industry's behalf, acclaimed
filmmaker and screenwriter Sudhir Mishra said discussions between the common
people, fimmakers and the government can only help towards improving the
standards of CBFC.
"There are various ways of looking at
cinema. All films are fiction. They are a point of view. An artist shouldn't
take on the responsibility of showing a direction to the society. This is not
his job. His job is to pop questions and to leave a message with his work. He
is not there to influence others," Mishra said.
"CBFC should be a certification body. I
think there should be a lot of conversation about it. That's what is
interesting in society where films like Housefull or Mastizaade
will put up another kind of debate. Finally people have to start rejecting
films that they don't wish to watch," he added.
During the discussion, Tripathi said the revising
committee is a welcome change as the rules followed by CBFC are very old and
not changed over the time.
"We as a board work under the 1952
Cinematograph Act, the guidelines of which need to be badly amended and
redrafted. The collaboration has to happen between the industry and the policy.
Otherwise we will be fighting. I feel why we are talking about this now is
because we are revisiting something that is creating issues," Tripathi
said.
Giving a journalistic view point on the issue,
Bamzai said: "All governments, regardless of which party is in power, want
to control movies and media. The BJP may have particularly ham-handed it. They
don't have the finesse of the Congress government".
He said that technology has
"outstripped" movie-making to such a degree that it really doesn't
matter.
"It's just a question of revenue. If Udta
Punjab had been released with the 89 cuts (that CBFC asked for), then also
people would have watched (the uncensored version) anyway. I don't know whether
Nihalani knows that we are living in the internet age."
The five-day Delhi leg of the Jagran Film
Festival, which kicked off on Friday, will end on July 5.
This
News Original Post on NEWS18
No comments:
Post a Comment