Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi with facts and quotes on the misinformation shared by congress over RSS role

Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi on News X debate gives clarity on the RSS role and also facts on false allegations by Congress leaders on RSS in relation to Mahatma Gandhi ji's assasination.

Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi on Islam in India

Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi on Islam in India. An eyeopener for many having misconcepts on religious lines

Ban Or Only Certify Films? Panelists Discuss CBFC's Role

Sudhir Mishra along with BJP spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi, CBFC member Vani Tripathi and journalist Kaveree Bamzai discussed whether CBFC is regulating films way beyond its parameters and if it is the correct time to make changes in its rules and regulations.

 New Delhi: At a time when many celebrities from the entertainment industry are demanding big changes in the certification process of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), a panel discussion was held at the 7th Jagran Film Festival here to examine its role in the current era.

Filmmaker Sudhir Mishra along with BJP spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi, CBFC member Vani Tripathi and journalist Kaveree Bamzai discussed whether CBFC is regulating films way beyond its parameters and if it is the correct time to make changes in its rules and regulations.

BJP-appointed Pahlaj Nihalani, chief of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), the controversy regarding Udta Punjab and role of the central government in censor board were some of the topics that the panelists put light upon in the discussion titled 'Is cinema over regulated?'

Talking about the role of the censor board, Tripathi said: "CBFC is not a censor but a certification body. I have been its member since last two years. The process (of certification) is very complicated and it's not a monolith. There is not just one person who decides the certification of a film. We are only there to certify a film and not cut it. The word 'ban' is not at all part of the vocabulary of CBFC".

Trivedi said that cinema has a big influence on the audience, that's why a regulatory body is need of the hour.

Comparing media with films, Trivedi added: "There is a difference between news and the impact of cinema. Earlier we used to say that literature is a mirror of the society. But I feel today cinema is a mirror of the society".

"The impact that films have on children is not the same when they read news. So when there is a medium which is influencing our perception towards the society, then there should be a regulatory body which can keep an eye on it. We should looks out that what message the film is spreading," he added.

Speaking on the industry's behalf, acclaimed filmmaker and screenwriter Sudhir Mishra said discussions between the common people, fimmakers and the government can only help towards improving the standards of CBFC.

"There are various ways of looking at cinema. All films are fiction. They are a point of view. An artist shouldn't take on the responsibility of showing a direction to the society. This is not his job. His job is to pop questions and to leave a message with his work. He is not there to influence others," Mishra said.

"CBFC should be a certification body. I think there should be a lot of conversation about it. That's what is interesting in society where films like Housefull or Mastizaade will put up another kind of debate. Finally people have to start rejecting films that they don't wish to watch," he added.

During the discussion, Tripathi said the revising committee is a welcome change as the rules followed by CBFC are very old and not changed over the time.

"We as a board work under the 1952 Cinematograph Act, the guidelines of which need to be badly amended and redrafted. The collaboration has to happen between the industry and the policy. Otherwise we will be fighting. I feel why we are talking about this now is because we are revisiting something that is creating issues," Tripathi said.

Giving a journalistic view point on the issue, Bamzai said: "All governments, regardless of which party is in power, want to control movies and media. The BJP may have particularly ham-handed it. They don't have the finesse of the Congress government".

He said that technology has "outstripped" movie-making to such a degree that it really doesn't matter.

"It's just a question of revenue. If Udta Punjab had been released with the 89 cuts (that CBFC asked for), then also people would have watched (the uncensored version) anyway. I don't know whether Nihalani knows that we are living in the internet age."

The five-day Delhi leg of the Jagran Film Festival, which kicked off on Friday, will end on July 5.

This News Original Post on NEWS18

Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi on votebank politics played by Congress and SP on relgious

Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi categorically states the past deeds of Congress and SP over dividing people on communal lines for vote bank politics

Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi's valid questions to AAP on the office of profit row over 21 MLAs

The relevant questions raised by Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi on the AAP's stated idealogy and what they put in practice..worth thinking.

Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi exposes double standards of Congress, SP and BSP on Kairana exodus

Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi drives the point home on how Congress, SP and BSP have been playing divisive politics over the years.

Ahead of Rajya Sabha polls, parties on edge, keep fingers crossed

NEW DELHI: On the eve of the crucial Rajya Sabha polls, official candidates of mainstream parties remained on the edge on Friday for fear over possible cross-voting and support of independents who hold the key in some places.

While BJP pulled all stops to manage the numbers for Independents it has covertly supported, a sense of unease prevails among other parties which have kept their legislators in good humour. However, BJP itself is feeling the heat in Rajasthan, where its 160 MLAs have been kept huddled in a hotel for the past three days.

Samajwadi Party and BSP in Uttar Pradesh, too, have been heaving lavish hospitality on their MLAs, including sumptuous meals. With seven candidates in the fray, the ruling SP has been the most hospitable to its legislators. For the last three days, the MLAs had party chief Mulayam Singh Yadav and Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav for company over dinner.

BSP chief Mayawati has been equally generous, interacting with media as well as party legislators. BSP has held three meetings with party MLAs in the past one week while Mayawati addressed the media twice.

Although, BSP has supported Congress nominees in Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh, the party is still silent about its 12 votes which could be crucial for Congress nominee Kapil Sibal, who is short of the required 34 votes. "Who we support will be clear after the results come out," Mayawati told reporters in Lucknow on Thursday.

There are 12 candidates against 11 vacancies in UP, where BJP-supported independent, Preeti Mahapatra, has created a flutter. Sibal, despite being short of the required numbers, is likely to romp home with possible support of BSP and RLD.

The SP has fielded seven candidates but its seventh candidate is short of nine first-preference votes. BJP spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi said the RS polls have exposed parties opposed to the NDA. "BSP is supporting Congress candidates but the two parties claim to be rivals. They should clear this ambiguity," he said.

Congress has declared support for independent candidate Kamal Morarka in Rajasthan where BJP has kept 160 MLAs in a hotel at Ajmer Road on the outskirts of Jaipur.

Rajasthan Congress president Sachin Pilot claimed that jammers had been installed around the hotel, where CM Vasundhara Raje and some of her ministerial colleagues are camping with the legislators.

"Government functioning has come to standstill as most of the ministers have been asked to take care of MLAs," said Pilot. He said his party's 24 MLAs would support Morarka so that there is no walkover to the BJP candidates.

Congress has formally decided to support INLD candidate, Supreme Court lawyer, RK Anand in Rajya Sabha polls in Haryana. "To defeat BJP supported candidate, it will be pertinent for us to support Anand," said Congress spokesperson Manish Tiwari on Friday. He said that Anand had met the Congress leadership and had expressed faith in Congress ideology. With Congress support, while RK Anand is set to re-enter the upper house against BJP supported independent Subhash Chandra.

BJP's senior leader Vinod Gotiya, contesting as independent in Madhya Pradesh, has a fight on hand with Congress nominee and senior lawyer Vivek Tankha for the third vacancy.

Mahesh Poddar is the other BJP-supported candidate vying from Jharkhand. In Uttarakhand, two independents — Gita Thakur and Anil Goel — are in the fray. However, BJP has distanced itself from them.

As against its 14 retiring members from different states, BJP may get 18 seats — a net gain of four seats. Overall, Congress (60 MPs) is likely to continue to be the largest party in RS, but the tally of UPA may for the first time be lower than that of NDA.

This Blog is Originally Posted on Time OF India

Why is BSP, Congress silent on Mathura clashes?: BJP

NEW DELHI: Attacking BSP and Congress on their "silence" over the Mathura clashes, BJP today alleged that they were trying to save the Samajwadi Party government in UP as because of their understanding to help each other in the Rajya Sabha polls.   
  
"It appears that all these parties are trying to save the Samajwadi Party government... Probably a reason is that in the Rajya Sabha polls, SP is supporting Congress and BSP too is supporting it in some states," BJP spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi said, referring to understanding among SP, BSP, Congress and Ajit Singh-led RLD.      
    
"Why are you silent? Is it because the religion and caste of the killed is not of help in fulfilling your political ambitions," he said at a press conference here.   
         
Trivedi said the silence of these parties is as much to blame as the UP government. He also attacked Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal over the issue, saying he otherwise speaks on all national and international issues but has maintained a surprising silence on the violence.      

Citing a sting shown by a private channel to hit out at the Akhilesh Yadav government, he said it was left with no face-saver now.    
"It is clear now that what happened in Mathura was not due to negligence but part of a conspiracy," he said.    
BJP alleged that sting has "exposed" the ruling party's collusion with Mathura's Jawahar Bagh encroachers.       
The party also asked the state government to immediately recommend a CBI inquiry so that truth could come out.     
 
"The sting has exposed the Chief Minister and his government. He had blamed officers for the violence. Now it has emerged that over 80 intelligence inputs were sent to the government but it did not act because it was in collusion with land mafia," BJP national secretary Shrikant Sharma claimed.   

The sting operation purportedly showed intelligence officials saying they had informed the state government about threats posed by the well-armed encroachers, who were also part of a sect.
    
Dwivedi rejected the state government's decision to appoint a one-man commission as an attempt for "cover up".       

He said a senior state minister, who is also a member of the ruling family, was part of the conspiracy behind this "institutional land grabbing" by SP. BJP has earlier blamed Shivpal Yadav, Akhilesh's uncle and a Cabinet minister, for the Mathura episode.  

Verdict 2016: BJP's gains were wrested by humbly learning lessons from previous defeats

Pushed on the backfoot after the Bharatiya Janata Party’s battering in the Delhi and Bihar assembly polls, the results of the assembly elections declared on Thursday proved to be a personal triumph for Prime Minister Narendra Modi and party president Amit Shah.

The BJP’s emphatic win in Assam and its expanded footprint in states like West Bengal and Kerala where the saffron outfit did not have a presence earlier, have re-established and strengthened the Modi-Shah duo’s credibility and authority in the party.

More importantly, the results will embolden the two leaders to go into next year’s high-stakes assembly election in the electorally-crucial state of Uttar Pradesh with renewed vigour. The BJP can now be expected to run a highly-polarised and aggressive campaign in the Hindi heartland state.

Although there was no threat to their leadership after the BJP’s rout in Delhi and Bihar, questions were raised within the party about the campaign strategy crafted by Shah in these states. The BJP president was privately criticised by party members for his authoritarian style of functioning and, at one stage, Shah’s re-election as party president appeared to be uncertain. In addition, there were murmurs about Modi’s waning charisma and his ability to deliver a victory.

However, Modi and Shah’s detractors in the party will be suitably silenced after the Thursday verdict.

Dissecting defeats

Unlike the Congress, which never learns from its past mistakes, the BJP’s poll strategists went back to the drawing board after their humiliating defeat in the earlier two assembly elections and drew up a fresh strategy for these elections. They realised that the party could no longer depend on Modi to win them elections and that it was essential to involve state leaders in this effort.

The party quickly changed tack and declared Sarbananda Sonowal as its chief ministerial candidate in Assam well before the polls were announced. The BJP did not stop at projecting a chief minister but it also involved the party’s state leaders in the campaign which was focussed primarily on local issues. In sharp contrast to its Bihar campaign, the Central leadership kept a low profile in Assam and there was no overt interference in the planning and execution of the campaign.

Similarly, the BJP stitched up strategic alliances with the Asom Gana Parishad and the Bodo People’s Front, which went a long way in building the momentum in its favour. Although it was helped by the fact that Assam was ready for a change after Tarun Gogoi’s uninterrupted 15-year-run in the state, the BJP staged a coup of sorts when it persuaded Gogoi’s bete noire Himanta Biswas Sarma to join their party.

Key role

Driven by his one-point agenda to settle scores with the Congress, Sarma emerged as the BJP’s star campaigner and chief strategist. His personal popularity and charisma drew in the crowds in hordes. In addition, it was Sarma who was instrumental in bringing the Bodo People’s Front and the Asom Gana Parishad to the negotiating table. Sarma, along with Modi and Shah, were also able to tap into the people’s growing angst on the sensitive issue of infiltration from across the border.

The strategy worked as the BJP now has its first state government in a major state like Assam, which is known to be a gateway to the North East. It will become easier for the BJP to foray into the other North Eastern states which have, so far, been a Congress stronghold.

Besides winning Assam, the BJP has reasons to be pleased with itself as it has opened its account in Kerala and has improved its tally and vote share in West Bengal, the two states where it has never been a strong presence.

The saffron party and its allies have notched up a 15% vote share in Kerala, which will now have its first BJP legislator, O Rajagopal, in the state assembly. Similarly, the BJP’s tally in West Bengal has gone up from one to five seats while its vote share is touching 20%.

As BJP spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi pointed out, “The BJP has made gains in all the states...these election are a reflection of the party’s geographical and political expansion.” Another senior BJP leader remarked, “Now we cannot be called a Hindi heartland party or cowbelt party...the BJP is a pan-Indian party and the central force in the country’s polity.”

Additional leverage

While these results will help the BJP in the coming assembly polls, it will also make it easier for the Modi government to push through its legislative agenda in Parliament. The ruling alliance was constantly blocked by the numerically stronger Congress in the Rajya Sabha where the BJP was in a minority. While the Congress is still the single largest party in the Upper House, the latest electoral setbacks will make it difficult for the grand old party to put up a strong and credible fight against the Modi government.

It will also become easier for the government to do business with the regional parties. The AIADMK and Biju Janata Dal have always been well disposed towards the BJP. Emerging stronger after her stupendous victory, Mamata Banerjee’s Trinamool Congress will be able to do business with the BJP with great confidence. According to a senior Congress leader, “The BJP always prefers to deal with regional parties... that’s the reason its main aim is to weaken our party.”

The assembly results will also prove to be a setback for Bihar chief minister’s proposed anti-BJP front. The Congress, which was expected to anchor this front, is in steady decline, making it difficult for other parties to align with it. There is also little possibility of non-BJP, non-Congress parties coming together on a common platform in the future, given the egos of their leaders and their state-level compulsions.

This New is Originally Posted on scroll.in

Swaraj Abhiyan seeks to drag BJP into chopper row

NEW DELHI: Seeking to drag BJP into the raging chopper row, Swaraj Abhiyan today accused the Chhattisgarh Government of floating a global tender in a "shady manner" to purchase a specific AgustaWestland helicopter by paying "over 30 percent" commission without exploring options.

Addresing a media conference here, Swaraj Abhiyan leaders, Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav, accused the Raman Singh government in the state of paying USD 1.57 million as commission to a company registered in tax-haven British Virginia Islands to procure the chopper.

The two also sought to link Chief Minister Raman Singh's son to the controversy saying Abhishek formed a company called Quest Heights Ltd on July 3, 2008 almost six months after the bulk of the payment was made by the state government to Sharp Ocean, an agent company.

Welcoming the NDA Government's "earnestness" to probe the matter, the leaders sought an enquiry to be initiated into the deal finalised by the state government by a former judge to be recommended by Chief Justice of India.

"It was pretended that the (state) government floated a global tender, while it was (specifically) written in the tender which model was to be purchased.




"And the bids interestingly were received from AgustaWestland, its commission agent and its service provider itself. And based on that the contract was finalised," Bhushan said.

He added, "The contract invoice shows the cost of the helicopter was only 5.1 million dollar, which was paid to AgustaWestland and 1.57 million dollar commission was given to commission agent Sharp Ocean based in British Virgin island."

Raman Singh refuted the charges levelled by Swaraj Abhiyan, saying they were politically motivated and an attempt by Bhushan to "deflect" the issue from the larger corruption angle in the main AgustaWestland chopper deal.

Addressing a news conference in Raipur tonight, he said the CAG in its audit report for the year ended March 31, 2011, had only pointed out that failure of the state's Aviation Department to finalise the first offer for purchase of Agusta A-109 within the due date and its subsequent procurement at higher rate had led to extra expenditure of Rs 65 lakh.

BJP spokesman Sudhanshu Trivedi said the Chief Minister has clarified the allegations raised by Swaraj Abhiyan.

Equipped with a bunch of documents, which they said were procured under RTI, the two leaders said the state government on December 19, 2006 decided to purchase a VIP chopper as the existing one required lot of maintenance.

"Amazingly within three days, a meeting took place between representatives of one OSS, supposedly the service provider of AgustaWestland helicopters, in which it made a presentation to the government about Agusta 109 Helicopter and made an offer to supply this helicopter at USD 6.31 million," Bhushan said.

He alleged the discussion was followed by "some correspondence" with the company, which told the Chattisgarh government that if it was to buy helicopter directly from AgustaWestland, then it would have to wait for more than two years and therefore, it should deal with its dealer/distributor Sharp Ocean based in Hong Kong.

He further said that the company is registered in British Virgin Islands, which may be able to supply a pre-sold Helicopter earlier.

A fortnight ago, the Chhattisgarh Government had refuted Congress charges in this regard, dubbing them as "politically motivated".

"The allegations levelled by Congress are baseless.

The helicopter deal was done through a global tendering process while maintaining full transparency," Panchayat and Rural Development Minister Ajay Chandrakar had said.

At the Congress briefing, party spokesman Jairam Ramesh, too, cliamed the Chhattisgarh government was "totally involved" in the AgustaWestland scam.

He alleged Abhishek Singh, son of the Chief Minister, is "somewhere linked" to this scam. His name has also figured in the Panama papers, he claimed.

This New is Originally Posted on The New Indian Express.